Blog Marcina Bojko

Linux,Windows,serwer, i tak dalej ;)

Posts Tagged ‘hypervisor

Hyper-V Integration Services en masse ;)

leave a comment »

Yes, we all „love” the way Microsoft gives us new stuff (like forced updates in Windows 10). As we usually know better what and when should be applied, let’s say it is time to upgrade our guest integration services to the latest version.
I usually  express strong conviction that HV integration services should be kept up to date, the thing most sysadmins disregards. Those tools are responsible for keeping your VMs in shape, maintain communication between them and host services, so they SHOULD be always updates. Of course, as with almost everything TEST it before applying on any important environment.
As on 2016-12-31, the latest HV Integration Services version is 6.3.9600.18398

Let’s say – we would like to upgrade all our Windows machines (those BEFORE Windows 10 and Windows 2016) . We can do it manually (not cool, not cool at all), semi-automatic (no reboot) or almost … magical way – fully automatic 😉

Let’s start we have proper source added to Chocolatey:

choco source add -n=public -s"https://www.myget.org/F/public-choco" --priority=10
  • semi automatic (RDP, psexec, powershell)
    choco install hvintegrationservices -y
  • fully automatic (with reboot) using The Foreman and win_manage

    win_manage:
        chocolatey_packages:
          hvintegrationservices:
            ensure: 6.3.9600.18398
        dsc_reboot:
          dsc_reboot:
            message: Machine requested a reboot
            when: pending

 

Written by marcinbojko

Grudzień 31, 2016 at 15:14

10 Myths about Hyper-V

leave a comment »

On my lectures and meetings with both: IT and Management  I’ve had a pleasure to be a myth buster about Hyper-V. As much as I don’t appreciate Microsoft’s ‚way of life’ – Hyper-V is mostly feared due to: lack of proper knowledge and very low quality support from Microsoft. Few most common myths are:

  1. It’s very expensive
    Let’s calculate:
    If you’re going to use standalone hosts with Microsoft Hyper-V Server your cost will be just zero coma zero.
    If you’re going to use a lots of Microsoft Windows virtual machines on them – you can rent them as SPLA licenses (per machine), or just rent Windows Datacenter edition for whole host.
    If you’re gonna to use Linux machines (assuming opensource, not paid edition) – again – zero coma zero
    If you’re going to use HA, all you need is just 1 (preferably more) OS for Domain Controller.
    If you’re gonna to manage standalone hosts, all you need (and rather as a suggestion) is a Microsoft Windows 10 Anniversary Edition machines. Just one 🙂
    You don’t have to pay extra for all fine features like: HA, Live Migration, Cluster Aware Updates. With W2k16 edition few extra features are available only in Datacenter edition (which I believe is a grave mistake) but that’s all.
  2. It requires System Center to be managed by
    No. As a matter of fact, SC is only useful in situations when you have lots of VLANS, Logical Network, templates to be deployed or Services. In any other case like: have your VLANS’s accounted for, drop Services as nobody is using this part. System Center Virtual Machine Manager is nothing more than overgrown cancer on a top of Powershell scripts it runs. Since 2012 edition Microsoft couldn’t ever fix the simplest things like: responsive console and not having refreshed it manually after every operation.
  3. It’s slower than VMWare or ‚any’ other competitor
    No. Overhead of Hyper-V is done mostly on storage level and most problems with it are created on a level of infrastructure design.
    For example: If you have a lot of hosts, and you do not require virtual machines there to be Highly Available – do not (i repeat) DO NOT connect them all as cluster nodes.
    If you’re using 1 or 2 iSCSI 1GB cards as you paths for low quality machines – expect nothing more than problems.
    Instead: use local storage, combined with low-end HW controllers. Even having 2 (mirror) or 4 (RAID5 or RAID10) disks for those machines is way better than having one underpowered ‚best of the world storage’. Plan this usage carefully – you still have things like Shared Nothing Live Migration (in a case of maintenance on specific host).
    Creating a lot of host, giving them all 1 or 2 ClusterSharedVolume to share is just asking for trouble.
  4. It requires a lot’s of PowerShell knowledge
    No. And I am the best example here 😉 With few exceptions like script for installing Hyper-V hosts, maybe create few LACPs – that’s all I used Powershell for.
  5. It doesn’t support Linux
    It does, it does it very well.
    Official document: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server-docs/compute/hyper-v/supported-linux-and-freebsd-virtual-machines-for-hyper-v-on-windows
    Few my lectures: https://marcinbojko.wordpress.com/2014/10/22/xxi-spotkanie-regionalnej-lubelskiej-grupy-microsoft-i-moj-wyklad-systemy-linux-na-platformie-hyper-v-2012/
    As a matter of fact – I use CentOS/RedHat, Ubuntu/Debian machines and appliances, and have to say: working with them on Hyper-V is just a simple pleasure.
    In 2016 with things like Hyper-V and Veeam, support for Linux machines on Hyper-V is very much alive. Even our beloved ‚System Center Virtual Machine Manager’ supports creating templates for Linux machines, with small agent to set a lots of things during and after deployment.
  6. It’s complicated to install, run, maintain especially HA & Clusters
    No. It is just simple as click few times: next, next, next,finish.
    Using System Center or (better) FailoverCluster Manager from any Windows Server machine works perfectly out of the box. Rules are simple, wizard will tell you what you should do next.
    With maintenance mode, Live Storage Migration, Cluster Aware Updates you can have stable and secure environment for your machines. Even migrating machines between different clusters (Shared Nothing Migration) is secure and efficient.
  7. It requires specific hardware 
    One of the biggest myths. Learn with a hard way with VMWare hosts , you do not require special NIC, special motherboards or any devices from very narrow VMWare HCL list. Requirements of Hyper-V are very small: VT enabled CPU, enough memory to fit VM’s and host OS itself, one HDD, one NIC. For small setups it almost equals in using desktops and other workstations as a hyper-v farm.
    After hearing this statement from one of my clients, I began to pursue the subject. It was someone from VMWare camp that told him: ‚you will need special hardware for SMB3 and SMB Direct’ – which is generally correct in a same matter like: ‚if you want a milk, you need a cow’ 😉
  8. It doesn’t work with Azure
    Hyper-V 2016  is a light years ahead of Azure:) They still seems to be using Windows 2008 as a hosts with all of its negative aspects.
    But, jokes aside, using pre-build templates or products like Veeam and Windows Azure Pack, creating you own hybrid cloud is one of the best things you can do. Don’t trust sales guy from Microsoft forcing you to ‚move everything to a cloud, our cloud’. Don’t trust you IT guy saying ‚only on premise or death!’. Live in a both worlds.
  9. I know NOTHING about Hyper-V.
    If you have ANY knowledge about Windows – you have knowledge about Hyper-V itself.
  10. But migration from platform X/Y/Z is pain in the ….
    Take a deep breath. Calculate it. Find tools to do it manually, recreate all you machines using somekind of CM tool (like mentioned The Foreman/Puppet)- https://marcinbojko.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/puppet-the-foreman-powershell-dsc-your-system-center-in-a-box/. Calculate it again.
    Do it 😉

Written by marcinbojko

Grudzień 28, 2016 at 17:12

%d bloggers like this: